Australia has taken a dramatic step in the aftermath of war crime allegations related to its military operations in Afghanistan. The Australian government has decided to strip several serving and former military commanders of their medals, following a scathing investigation into the actions of Australian special forces during the Afghanistan war.
The Brereton Report: A Stark Revelation
In 2020, the Brereton Report unveiled troubling findings about Australian special forces’ conduct in Afghanistan. Maj. Gen. Paul Brereton led the investigation, which uncovered evidence suggesting that around 25 troops from the Australian Special Air Service Regiment (SASR) and the Commando Regiment were involved in the unlawful killings of 39 Afghan civilians. This report, which has been described as one of the most serious allegations of Australian war crimes in history, has now led to significant consequences for those in command.
Defense Minister Richard Marles announced that medals awarded to these commanders for their service between 2005 and 2016 have been revoked. The decision comes as part of the government’s response to the investigation’s findings and aims to hold commanders accountable for the actions of their troops, even if they were not directly implicated in the crimes.
Why Medals Were Stripped: Accountability or Betrayal?
The move to strip medals has sparked a heated debate. Marles explained that the medals were not removed due to direct wrongdoing by the commanders. Instead, the decision is based on a principle of accountability. When a unit receives accolades, the leaders benefit from the recognition, but they also bear the responsibility for the unit’s actions, including failings.
Martin Hamilton-Smith, chair of the Australian Special Air Service Association, condemned the decision, arguing that it undermines the bravery and sacrifice of soldiers in Afghanistan. He believes the decision is based on allegations that have not been proven, and overlooks the courage demonstrated by the officers in challenging circumstances.
Political and Military Fallout
Opposition lawmaker Andrew Hastie has also weighed in on the controversy. Hastie, a former SAS captain who served in Afghanistan in 2013, argues that the responsibility for the alleged crimes should extend up the chain of command. He suggests that both political leaders and military hierarchy should be held accountable for failing to prevent or address the misconduct.
Hastie points out that those in command saw the post-mission reports and had a duty to question the discrepancies and potential misconduct. His comments highlight a broader issue of accountability in military and political leadership.
The Legal and Social Implications
While no Australian veteran has been criminally convicted for war crimes in Afghanistan, the case of David McBride stands out. McBride, a former army lawyer and whistleblower, was sentenced to nearly six years in prison for leaking classified information that exposed war crimes allegations. His case underscores the risks faced by those who attempt to reveal the truth.
In 2023, Oliver Schulz became the first Australian veteran charged with a war crime, accused of killing a non-combatant in Uruzgan province. Additionally, Ben Roberts-Smith, Australia’s most decorated living war veteran, was found by a civil court to have likely unlawfully killed four Afghans. Despite these findings, he has not been criminally charged.
Key Takeaways
-
Stripping of Medals: Australian military commanders have had their medals revoked in response to war crime allegations.
-
Brereton Report: The report highlighted serious allegations against Australian special forces in Afghanistan.
-
Controversy: The decision to strip medals has been met with mixed reactions, with some seeing it as necessary accountability and others as an unjust betrayal.
-
Chain of Command: There are calls for broader accountability, including at the political and military leadership levels.
-
Legal Proceedings: No convictions have been made so far, but cases like David McBride’s highlight the complex legal and ethical landscape surrounding these allegations.
Links for Further Reading:
