Baltimore’s Choice of Law Firm for DPW Review Sparks Controversy
Baltimore’s decision to hire Conn Maciel Carey, a law firm with a contentious history of opposing strict regulations, to review workplace conditions within the Department of Public Works (DPW) has stirred significant debate. The review follows the tragic death of city sanitation worker Ronald Silver II, who collapsed and died during a heatwave. Critics argue that Conn Maciel’s track record could undermine the integrity of the investigation.
A Controversial Choice for a Critical Review
The firm, Conn Maciel Carey, has been enlisted to scrutinise the working conditions at DPW after Silver’s death on a sweltering 99-degree day. This decision has raised eyebrows due to the firm’s history of opposing stringent safety regulations. Here’s why this is causing concern:
-
History of Opposition: Conn Maciel Carey has a well-documented history of representing clients who resist tougher regulations. This includes efforts to weaken a proposed OSHA rule on heat-related injuries. The firm’s resistance to mandatory breaks and more stringent monitoring requirements for heat illness raises questions about its objectivity.
-
Industry Reputation: Critics, including former OSHA officials, argue that Conn Maciel’s role might compromise the review’s impartiality. Jordan Barab, a former deputy assistant secretary of OSHA, expressed concerns about the firm’s history of lobbying against regulations designed to protect workers.
The Firm’s Track Record and Its Implications
Conn Maciel Carey’s involvement in lobbying against heat-related injury regulations is particularly relevant:
-
Heat-Related Injury Regulations: The firm argued against mandatory breaks for workers and suggested that monitoring requirements for supervisors should be relaxed. This stance has been seen as undermining efforts to enforce robust safety measures in high-temperature work environments.
-
Criticism from Experts: Experts like Barab argue that Conn Maciel’s past actions could signal a bias towards business interests rather than worker safety. This raises doubts about the firm’s ability to conduct an unbiased review of DPW’s working conditions.
City’s Justification and Response
Despite the criticism, Baltimore officials defend their choice:
-
Expertise in Heat Illness: A spokesperson for Mayor Brandon Scott stated that Conn Maciel was chosen for their “niche technical expertise” in heat illness and injury prevention. The firm includes an industrial hygienist and a former NLRB attorney, which the city believes provides a unique perspective.
-
City’s Authority: The city asserts that it retains full control over implementing any recommended changes. The decision to hire Conn Maciel, according to the spokesperson, was made based on their specific expertise, not their regulatory stance.
Reactions from Labour Unions and Advocates
Labour unions and safety advocates have voiced strong opposition:
-
Union Concerns: Stuart Katzenberg of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Maryland Local 3, which represents DPW workers, criticised the decision. He argued that hiring Conn Maciel was akin to “the fox guarding the hen house” due to the firm’s track record.
-
Call for Transparency: Silver’s family, through their lawyer Thiru Vignarajah, has called for a transparent and thorough investigation. They have requested that Inspector General Isabel Mercedes Cumming review the circumstances surrounding Silver’s death.
Broader Implications and Industry Insights
The controversy highlights broader issues within workplace safety regulation:
-
Regulatory Challenges: The debate underscores ongoing challenges in balancing business interests with worker safety. Critics argue that weakening regulations can compromise worker health, particularly in hazardous conditions like extreme heat.
-
Need for Stronger Standards: Safety experts, like Barab, argue that effective regulations for heat stress are not overly complex. They emphasise the need for clear, enforceable standards to ensure worker safety and prevent tragedies like Silver’s death.
Conclusion
Baltimore’s choice of Conn Maciel Carey for the DPW review has sparked significant debate due to the firm’s history of opposing tougher safety regulations. While the city defends the decision based on the firm’s technical expertise, critics argue that the firm’s past actions could undermine the investigation’s impartiality. As the review proceeds, the focus will remain on whether it delivers a thorough and unbiased assessment of workplace conditions at DPW.
Additional Resources
For more information on Conn Maciel Carey’s regulatory history and workplace safety issues, check out these resources:
