In the aftermath of Attorney General Bob Ferguson’s resounding victory in Washington’s 2024 gubernatorial race, the state’s Republican Party has unveiled a bold initiative, the “Project to Resist Tyranny.” This project aims to push back against what they perceive as the erosion of individual freedoms and constitutional rights under Ferguson’s leadership.
Washington GOP Chairman Jim Walsh, a fierce critic of Ferguson, expressed his concerns about the incoming governor’s track record. Walsh has been vocal about his belief that Ferguson, a staunch Democrat, has consistently sided with “big government” over personal liberties. With Ferguson poised to take office, Republicans in Washington are gearing up for what they predict will be a battle for the future of the state.
The Core Concerns: Ferguson’s History and the “Project to Resist Tyranny”
The Project to Resist Tyranny comes as no surprise to many, as Walsh and other GOP members have long criticised Ferguson for his policies, particularly in the realms of public safety and gun rights. Ferguson’s tenure as Attorney General saw him frequently clashing with conservative ideologies, most notably in his legal battles against the Trump administration and his efforts to strengthen gun control laws in Washington.
The Washington GOP sees these actions as part of a broader agenda to curtail freedoms, something Walsh claims will only worsen under Ferguson’s leadership as governor. In his words, Ferguson has shown a “disregard for Washingtonians’ personal liberties,” placing the state on a dangerous path toward increased government control.
Bob Ferguson’s Gubernatorial Agenda: What to Expect
Bob Ferguson’s gubernatorial agenda is already taking shape, with a focus on combating the federal government’s Project 2025—a sweeping policy proposal from the incoming Republican administration. The Ferguson administration has vowed to protect Washington from the potential harms of Project 2025, with a newly-formed transition team dedicated to the task.
In response, the Washington GOP is preparing to challenge any actions they see as unconstitutional, whether they come from Ferguson himself or from his alignment with federal policies they oppose. These clashes will set the stage for the ongoing political tension in the state as both sides gear up for a long battle over the future direction of Washington.
Public Safety: A Flashpoint for Debate
One of the most contentious issues between the Washington GOP and Ferguson revolves around public safety. The GOP claims that Ferguson’s approach, which often favours criminal rights over those of victims, has only worsened crime in the state.
Ferguson’s notable attempt to prosecute the officers involved in the 2020 death of Manuel Ellis, a case that made national headlines, continues to be a major talking point for Republicans. Walsh and others argue that Ferguson’s actions undermine law enforcement and place the interests of criminals ahead of the safety of law-abiding citizens.
Despite Ferguson’s record on criminal justice reform, which is often hailed by progressives, the GOP points to rising crime rates in Washington. Between 2020 and 2022, the state saw a significant uptick in violent crimes, contrasting with the national trend of decreasing crime rates. Washington also ranked second in the nation for property crime rates in 2023, prompting many to question whether Ferguson’s policies are effective.
The Gun Rights Debate: Ferguson’s Assault on the Second Amendment?
Another key issue for the GOP is gun rights. Washington has long been a battleground for the debate over the Second Amendment, with gun control advocates pushing for stricter regulations. Under Ferguson’s tenure as Attorney General, the state passed significant restrictions, including a ban on assault weapons and efforts to restrict the sale of high-capacity magazines.
However, the Washington GOP argues that Ferguson’s policies have not led to a safer state. Jim Walsh points out that, despite these measures, crime has increased, raising the question: “Where are the results?”
The GOP’s criticism focuses on what they see as unconstitutional infringements on the right to bear arms. The state’s constitution is clearer on the issue than the federal constitution, Walsh argues, and any action to restrict gun rights further is a direct attack on individual freedoms.
Litigation: A Necessary Weapon for Defending Rights
As the Project to Resist Tyranny progresses, the Washington GOP is prepared to take legal action when necessary. Walsh acknowledges that the state’s Republican Party does not want to resort to lawsuits but is ready to defend Washingtonians’ constitutional rights in court if Ferguson’s administration oversteps its bounds.
The party is already coordinating with federal policymakers to ensure that the rights of state residents are not trampled by what they view as an overreaching state government. Litigation, they believe, is a necessary tool in their fight for liberty, ensuring that the state’s laws align with the constitution and protect individual freedoms.
Communism and Tyranny: The GOP’s Warnings About Ferguson’s Policies
A controversial aspect of the Project to Resist Tyranny is its reference to The Communist Manifesto. When asked why this comparison was made, Walsh explained that the manifesto’s focus on the collective good over individual rights bears a striking resemblance to the policies he believes Ferguson will push in office.
Walsh clarified that he wasn’t calling Ferguson a communist, but rather drawing a parallel between the disregard for civil liberties seen in collectivist ideologies and the policies Ferguson has pursued as Attorney General. The GOP’s message is clear: the fight for individual rights and freedoms is at the heart of their resistance to Ferguson’s agenda.
Conclusion: Washington’s Political Future Under Bob Ferguson
As Washington prepares for the swearing-in of Bob Ferguson as governor, the stage is set for a fierce political battle between the state’s Republican and Democratic factions. The Washington GOP’s Project to Resist Tyranny is a clear declaration of intent to oppose any policies that infringe on the constitutional rights of the state’s residents.
For Jim Walsh and other Republicans, the fight is about protecting the rights of Washingtonians from what they see as government overreach. Whether this battle will lead to legal challenges or widespread political resistance remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: Ferguson’s policies will be under intense scrutiny as he takes the reins of power in Washington.
Relevant links for further reading
Photo credit: Washington State Republican Party
