Financial nudges, like automatic payments and auto-enrollment in 401(k) plans, are designed to make it easier for people to make good financial decisions. In theory, these nudges should help people build wealth and save for the future, right? Well, not always.
While these nudges do work in some cases, recent studies show that they aren’t as effective in the long run as initially promised. Worse, some nudges can lead to negative outcomes, such as more debt and higher interest payments. Let’s explore why financial nudges often fail, and what can be done to improve them.
The Power of Nudges (And Their Limitations)
When it comes to personal finance, nudges have become a popular tool. Employers auto-enroll their employees in retirement savings plans, while banks and credit card companies offer automatic payment options. These strategies do seem to work initially. For example, employees are more likely to participate in their 401(k) plan if they are automatically enrolled.
But here’s the problem: nudges only address one part of the financial equation, and often overlook other important factors.
“Nudges are not a panacea,” says Jialan Wang, an associate professor of finance at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. “But that doesn’t mean that a smartly designed nudge can’t help people on average.”
Wang has spent over a decade studying how Americans pay down credit card debt, and her research reveals some concerning findings.
The Downside of Autopay
In a recent study by Wang, credit card holders were given the option to enroll in autopay for either the minimum payment or the full balance. Unsurprisingly, autopay more than doubled the number of people making just the minimum payment. While this prevented late fees and improved credit scores, it also led to more debt and higher interest payments.
“Autopay has a convenience feature, and it does prevent you from being late,” says Wang. “But it also comes with a downside—people end up paying more in interest.”
In other words, people may stick with the minimum payment option for too long, trapping themselves in debt. Wang suggests that offering more autopay options might help people avoid this problem. But as another study shows, it’s not always that simple.
Fixed Payments Aren’t Always Better
Benedict Guttman-Kenney, an assistant professor of finance at Rice University, tested a similar theory in the UK. His team gave credit card users different payment options, such as paying a fixed amount or the full balance. While the fixed amount seemed like a promising option at first, it didn’t have the desired effect.
After seven months, Guttman-Kenney found that the people who chose the fixed amount still didn’t reduce their debt. Why? Because the fixed payments were often just slightly above the minimum payment, allowing balances to grow faster than the debt was paid down.
“It was a disappointing finding overall,” says Guttman-Kenney.
Retirement Savings and the Pitfalls of Auto-Enroll
Let’s switch gears and talk about retirement savings. In 2006, Congress passed the Pension Protection Act, encouraging employers to automatically enroll employees in 401(k) plans. This was seen as a big win for financial security. Early studies showed that auto-enrollment led to higher participation rates and better savings outcomes.
Fast forward to today, and the long-term benefits are not as clear. James Choi, a professor of finance at Yale, recently revisited his earlier research on auto-enrollment. His new findings show that many workers eventually cash out their savings when they change jobs, a practice known as leakage.
In addition, auto-enrollment often leads to lower contribution rates. When people leave jobs after a year or two, their 401(k) contributions don’t increase as much as they would with manual adjustments. The result? Many workers find themselves back at square one when starting a new job, with low contribution rates and a smaller retirement nest egg.
Why Don’t Financial Nudges Always Work?
It’s clear that financial nudges don’t always work as intended. But why?
-
Circumstances Matter: Nudges often fail to consider people’s individual financial situations. If someone doesn’t have enough money, no amount of nudging will magically fix that. People with limited bank savings often choose low payments because that’s what they can afford.
-
Short-Term vs. Long-Term: Nudges like auto-enrollment are designed for the long-term, but life events—such as changing jobs or unexpected expenses—disrupt those plans. Turnover and job changes make it harder for nudges to have lasting impact.
-
Nudge Overload: People are bombarded with nudges, from credit card payments to retirement savings to utility bills. Too many nudges can cause people to tune out, making them less effective over time.
-
Shifting Money, Not Patterns: Research shows that higher-income individuals simply shift money from one account to another, rather than changing their overall spending habits. This means that nudges aimed at increasing savings may have limited impact for wealthier people.
Making Nudges Work Better
So, where do we go from here? Should we give up on nudges altogether? Not necessarily. But we do need to rethink how they’re designed.
Here’s what needs to change:
-
Customisation: Nudges need to be tailored to an individual’s financial situation. Offering more autopay options, for example, could prevent people from getting stuck with the minimum payment.
-
Long-Term Focus: Policymakers need to consider the long-term effects of nudges. Auto-enrollment might get people into retirement savings plans, but without additional measures, such as financial education or job stability, it won’t be enough.
-
Holistic Approach: Financial nudges shouldn’t work in isolation. Instead, they should address the broader financial picture. People need emergency savings to cover unexpected costs, not just retirement preparedness.
Conclusion: The Future of Financial Nudges
It’s clear that financial nudges are not a one-size-fits-all solution. They can help, but they also have limitations. To improve financial outcomes, we need to rethink how these tools are used, focusing on the long-term and addressing individual financial situations.
As Jialan Wang puts it, “Nudges can be a powerful tool, but they are just one piece of the puzzle.” Let’s use that piece wisely.
